Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 07:06
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What are my 10 favorite rock record album opening tracks?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
It sounds like WWE has an explosive angle planned for SmackDown - Cageside Seats
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Shohei Ohtani throws fastest pitch of career at 101.7 mph in 3rd mound start for Dodgers - AP News
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Bitcoin update: From 80 bytes to 4MB – How BTC’s brain can get bigger - AMBCrypto
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Private-sector firms added just 37,000 jobs in May, the lowest total in more than two years - CNN
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.